Ekonomi Keuangan dan Perbankan

The following is the profile of graduates of the Economics, Finance, and Banking Study Programme

Graduate Profile	Profile Description
Assistant Lecturer in Economics, Finance and Banking	Assigned to assist lecturers / educators as academic implementers in Higher Education and is responsible for the activities of the Tri Dharma of Higher Education.
Research Assistant for Economics, Finance and Banking	Assigned in terms of assisting researchers in conducting research, development, and assessment of science and technology in research organizations, development and assessment of government / private institutions.
Employees of Government Institutions serving in the fields of Economics and Finance	Conducted economic and financial functions in the field of government.
Prudential micro and macro supervisory agency employees	Served as an employee of prudential micro and macro supervisory institutions, namely Bank Indonesia (BI) and the Financial Services Authority (OJK)
Bank and non-bank Financial Institution employees	Serving as an employee of a financial institution, either bank or non-bank that plays a role in supporting the banking function as an intermediary institution
Employees of Institutions involved in Money market & Capital market	Served as an employee at institutions involved in the Money Market & Capital Market, such as the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), Securities Companies, Investment Management, etc.
Analyst and Consultant in Economics, Finance and Banking	Served as a financial analyst and consultant who is capable of planning, analysing, and compiling reports on business planning and/or research.
Expert Staff/Member of Parliament	Providing research on the financial sector.

The learning outcomes of graduates (ILO) of the Undergraduate Programme in Economics, Finance, and Banking include 4 competencies, namely attitudes, general skills, special skills, Mastery of Knowledge as follows:

ILO	PEO 1	PEO 2	PEO 3
ILO-1: Capable of internalizing professional academic values, norms, and ethics (S8)			v
ILO 2: Capable of demonstrating a responsible attitude towards work in the field of expertise independently (S9)			v
ILO 3: Capable of applying logical, critical, systematic, and innovative thinking in the development or implementation of science and technology considering and applying humanities values in accordance with their field of expertise​​ (KU1)		v
ILO 4: Capable of compiling a scientific description of the results of studies on the implications of the development or implementation of science and technology that pays attention to and applies the values ​​of the humanities in accordance with their field of expertise based on scientific principles, procedures and ethics in order to produce solutions, ideas, designs or art criticisms, compiling a scientific description of the results the study in the form of a thesis or final project report (KU3, KU 4)		v
ILO 5: Capable of making appropriate decisions in the context of problem solving based on the results of information and data analysis (KU5)		v
ILO 6: Capable of demonstrating a conforming way of thinking in economics, finance and business (KK1)	v
ILO 7: Capable of Applying economic, financial, and business theory in analysing economic development issues and policies in to solve economic problems at regional, national, and global levels (KK6)	v
ILO 8: Capable of designing and conducting research, analysing and interpreting data through quantitative and qualitative approaches in economics, finance, and banking (KK3, KK7)		v
ILO 9: Capable of mastering the concepts and theories of economics (P1, P2, P3, P4)	v
ILO 10: Capable of mastering the concepts and theories of applied economics in finance and banking (P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10)	v

PS EKP maps out the compulsory and elective courses based on its ILOs, and they are organized systematically while taking into account the student’s learning load and the complexity and depth of the study material. PS EKP curriculum structures generally offer 159 credits, but students can take at least 148 credits to graduate. These credits are divided into seven subject groups: General/National Compulsory Courses (8 credits), University Compulsory Courses (14 credits), Faculty Compulsory Courses (18 credits), Major Compulsory Courses (45 credits), Study Programme Compulsory Courses (54 credits), and Elective Courses (9 credits). PS EKP has accomodated MBKM curriculum by providing convertible course into MBKM activities approximately 40 credits. In any case, student participate in MBKM activities for two consecutive semesters, the total credits students take until graduation is 149. Compulsory courses aim to develop graduates’ main competencies (approximately 94% of total credits), while elective courses aim to strengthen core competencies (approximately 6% of total credits).

Students are declared passed if they take a minimum of 148 credits with the following details:

1. Number of credits for compulsory courses : 139 credits
2. Number of credits of elective courses available : 9 credits

The complete PS EKP curriculum structure is depicted in the roadmap below:

The type of credit system applied in PS EKP is the Semester Credit Unit (SKS). If the SKS system is converted to the ECTS system, the credits that must be taken by students of the PS EKP without participate in MBKM activities are as follows:

• Number of Credits for General/National Compulsory Courses (8 SKS) = 1.5x8SKS = 12 ECTS
• Number of Credits for University Compulsory Courses (14 credits) = 1.5x14SKS = 21 ECTS
• Number of Credits for Compulsory Faculty Courses (18 credits = 1.5×18 credits = 27 ECTS
• Number of credits for Major compulsory subjects (45 credits) = 1.5×45 credits = 67.5 ECTS
• Number of SKS for Study Programs Compulsory Courses (54 SKS) = 1.5×54 SKS = 81 ECTS
• Number of credits for elective courses (9 credits) = 1.5×9 credits = 13.5 ECTS

Then the number of credits PS EKP students must take until graduation is 222 ECTS. Meanwhile,  in case student takes MBKM for two semesters, the number of credit that PS EKP students must take for graduation is 149 sks or equal to 223.5 ECTS.

To see the curriculum structure in more detail, please access the following link:

Final – Curriculum Summary PS EKP

1.Assessment of learning outcomes based on the grading system

The assessment procedure for PS EKP in all courses (except KKN-P and Thesis) is based on the assessment procedure contained in the FEB UB manual. The assessment procedure uses a grading system based on an OBE-based curriculum which consists of two methods, namely the case method and team-based project. The following are the assessment components for the case method:

Components	Proportion
Participation	55%
Quiz	5%
Task	10%
Mid-Semester Exam (UTS)	15%
Final Semester Exam (UAS)	15%

Note: *) the proportion of the assessment components is adjusted to the learning outcomes and assessment methods in each study program

Meanwhile, the assessment components for the team-based project can be seen in the following table.

Components	Proportion
Participation	25%
Quiz	10%
Project	35%
Mid-Semester Exam (UTS)	15%
Final Semester Exam (UAS)	15%

Based on the proportion of these value components, the absolute value calculation is as follows:

NA Case Method: 0,55 P + 0,5Q + 0,1 TS + 0,15 UTS + 0,15 UAS

NA Team Based Project: 0,25 P + 0,1Q + 0,35 HP + 0,15 UTS + 0,15 UAS

Absolute Score	Letter Score	Letter Grade Proportion
>80 – 100	A	4.0
>75 – 80	B+	3.5
>69 – 75	B	3.0
>60 – 69	C+	2.5
>55 – 60	C	2.0
>50 – 55	D+	1.5
>44 – 50	D	1.0
0 – 44	E	0.0

For KKN-P has its own assessment method. The final KKN-P score is a combination of the scores given by the KKN-P partners and also the KKN-P supervisor lecturers. The following are the assessment components for KKN-P partners and supervisors as follows:

KKN-P Partner Assessment			KKN-P Advisor
Assessment Component	Score Range	Assessment Component		Score Range
1.   Technical ability/assignment of KKN-P material	0-100	1.   Relevance area of ​​expertise		0-100
2.   Creativity	0-100	2.   Ability to explain (maintain)		0-100
3.   Leadership	0-100	3.   Level of difficulty		0-100
4.   Communication skills	0-100	4.   Report presentation		0-100
5.   Discipline	0-100
6.   Politeness	0-100
7.   Appearance	0-100
Average score of KKN-P partners	0-100	average score of the supervising lecturer		0-100

The seven aspects assessed by the KKN-P Partners were averaged, as were the four aspects assessed by the KKN-P supervisors. The average results of the KKN-P Partner scores and supervisors are added up and then averaged again to obtain the absolute final score. The provisions for the final grade of KKN-P in letters follow the same provisions as other courses

As for the thesis using a different assessment method. The thesis examination stages are divided into 2, namely the Proposal Seminar Examination and the Comprehensive Examination. The Proposal Seminar Exam has a weight of 33% and the Comprehensive Exam has a weight of 67% towards the final score of the Student Thesis. The provisions for the final value of the Thesis in letters follow the same provisions as other courses. For each exam has the same assessment components, namely:

 

Assessment Component	Proportion
Thesis Quality	50%
Mastery of Thesis & Theory Materials	30%
Presentation Quality	20%
Total score	100%

2.Assessment of ILO Achievements

The following is the method of measuring or achieving ILO PS EKP:

a)Develop linkages between CLO and ILO PS EKP

b)Develop CLO weighting based on assessment components (participation, quizzes, assignments, UTS, UAS). The CLO weighting for each component of the course is arranged based on the relevance between the ILO/CLO and the assessment method which is distinguished based on the CLO aspect and the type of courses offered, as shown in the following table:

ILO/CLO Group	Nature of Courses	Assessment Method
Attitude	Theory & Applied Economics Course	Participation & Assignments
Knowledge	Theory & Applied Economics Course	Assignments, Quiz, UTS and UAS
Applied Skills/Analysis	Applied economics & analytical methods course	Participation and Assignments

c)ILO and CLO achievement standards

Score Range	Achievements
80	Excellent
65 score < 80	Good
50 score < 65	Fair
0 score < 50	Poor

No	Position	Name
1	Professor	Prof. Dr. AGUS SUMAN, SE., DEA.
2	Professor	Prof. Dr. CANDRA FAJRI ANANDA, S.E., M.Sc.
3	Professor	Prof. DEVANTO SHASTA PRATOMO, S.E., M.Si., Ph.D.
4	Professor	Prof. Dr. GHOZALI MASKI, SE., MS.
5	Professor	Prof. Dr. M. PUDJIHARDJO, S.E., M.S.
6	Professor	Prof. Dr. MOH. KHUSAINI, S.E., M.Si., M.A.
7	Professor	Prof. Dr. M. UMAR BURHAN
8	Professor	Prof. Dr. MUNAWAR, SE., DEA.
9	Associate Professor	DAVID KALUGE, SE., MS., M.Ec.Dev., Ph.D.
10	Associate Professor	PUTU MAHARDIKA ADI SAPUTRA, SE., M.Si., MA., Ph.D.
11	Associate Professor	SETYO TRI WAHYUDI, SE., M.Ec., Ph.D.
12	Associate Professor	Dr. SRI MULJANINGSIH, SE., MSP.
13	Assistant Professor	BAHTIAR FITANTO, SE., MT.
14	Assistant Professor	DIAS SATRIA, SE., M.App.Ec., Ph.D.
15	Assistant Professor	EDDY SUPRAPTO, SE., ME.
16	Assistant Professor	Dr.rer.pol. FERRY PRASETYIA, SE., M.App.Ec.
17	Assistant Professor	Dra. MARLINA EKAWATY, M.Si., Ph.D.
18	Assistant Professor	MOH. ATHOILLAH, S.E., M.E.
19	Assistant Professor	Dr. NURUL BADRIYAH, S.E., M.E.
20	Assistant Professor	Dr. RACHMAD KRESNA SAKTI, SE., M.Si.
21	Assistant Professor	SHOFWAN, SE., M.Si.
22	Assistant Professor	TYAS DANARTI HASCARYANI, SE., ME.
23	Assistant Professor	Dr.rer.pol. WILDAN SYAFITRI, SE., ME.
24	Lecturer	AJENG KARTIKA GALUH, S.E., M.E.
25	Lecturer	AMINNULLAH ACHMAD MUTTAQIN, M.Sc., Fin.
26	Lecturer	ATU BAGUS WIGUNA, S.E., M.E.
27	Lecturer	DWI RETNO WIDIYANTI, SE.I., M.Sc.
28	Lecturer	FAISHAL FADLI, S.E., M.E., Ph.D.
29	Lecturer	FARAH WULANDARI PANGESTUTY, S.E., M.E., Ph.D.
30	Lecturer	LAILA MASRURO PIMADA, S.E., M.S.E.I.
31	Lecturer	NUGROHO SURYO BINTORO, S.E., M.Ec.Dev., Ph.D.
32	Lecturer	NURMAN SETIAWAN FADJAR, S.E., M.Sc.
33	Lecturer	PUSPITASARI WAHYU ANGGRAENI, S.E., M.Ec.Dev.
34	Lecturer	VIETHA DEVIA SS, S.E., M.E., Ph.D.
35	Lecturer	YENNY KORNITASARI, S.E., M.E.