Magister Ilmu Ekonomi – Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya

Overview

Graduate Profile

Learning Outcome

Curriculum

Assessment Method

Lecturer

Handbook

Head of Master Program in Economics

Dr.rer.pol. Wildan Syafitri, S.E.,M.E

Brief Profile

Master’s Programme in Economics is a Study Program (PS) established by the Department of Economics, Universitas Brawijaya on July 4, 2001 through the approval of the Directorate General of Higher Education Number 2294/D/T/2001. PMIE has a curriculum as a plan and arrangement regarding the objectives, content, and teaching materials as a guide for organizing learning activities to achieve higher education goals. This curriculum is used as the direction and purpose of developing scientific dynamics and achieving the expected goals. This dynamic serves as the consensus for the development of society.

The current PMIE curriculum is a refinement of the 2017 curriculum, reviewed and improved in 2018. The curriculum contains a set of plans and arrangements regarding graduate learning outcomes, study materials, processes, and finally an assessment that will be used as a guide for the implementation of education in the Master’s Programme in Economics (PMIE) refers to the rules:

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System.
Enactment of the Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2012 concerning the Indonesian National Qualifications Framework (KKNI)
Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2020 concerning National Higher Education Standards.
Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 23 of 2015 concerning Development of Character to Accommodate Literacy Development.
Brawijaya University Academic Manual 2019/2020

Vision

“To become an excellent, international standard Master’s of Economics educational institution, and produce quality graduates who are Capable of developing science in a sustainable manner”

Mission

Organizing educational programs and learning processes to produce graduates who are competent and able to respond to the challenges of changing the economic environment;
Conducting research and development activities in the economic field with a comprehensive, critical, innovative approach for the advancement of science and public welfare;
Disseminating science and technology in the economic field through various forms of scientific and social activities.

Program Educational Objectives

The purpose of the Master’s Programme in Economics is to produce graduates who work as Lecturers, Researchers, Consultants, Practitioners, and Policy Stakeholders in accordance with the following competencies:

PEO 1: Capable of developing economic theory and empirical methods with inter and multidisciplinary approaches to solve economic problems in accordance with the development of science and technology.
PEO 2: Capable of developing themselves through continuous research and education.
PEO 3: Capable of having professional ethics and attitude as well as effective communication orally and in writing.

The following is the profile of graduates of the Master’s Programme in Economics

No	Graduate Profile	Profile Description
1	Lecturer	Parties who have the ability/competence to educate, teach, guide, direct, train, assess, evaluate, and develop education, research, and community service in the field of Economics at private or state educational institutions
2	Researcher	Parties who have the competence to identify economic problems, find solutions through scientific procedures, and publish and disseminate the results of their research.
3	Consultant	Parties who have the ability/competence to identify and formulate economic problems, regional development, and carry out construction implementation methods in the field, as well as present several alternative solutions related to existing problems according to scientific studies in the field of economics and conventional and sharia development planning.
4	Practitioner	Parties who have the ability/competence to act as implementers in the economic field related to the specialization of graduates.
5	Policy Stakeholders	Parties who have the ability/competence in technical (advanced/applied economics) and legal (law) fields to be able to act as bureaucrats in economics and development planning in the development of construction implementation methods as well as during the policy-making process.

The learning outcomes of graduates (ILO) of the Master’s Programme in Economics include 4 competencies, namely attitudes, general skills, special skills, Mastery of Knowledge as follows:

ILO	PEO 1	PEO 2	PEO 3
ILO 1 – Capable of demonstrating a responsible attitude towards work in their field of expertise independently			V
ILO 2 – Capable of internalizing the academic values, norms, and ethics based on local and spiritual values (ethical awareness)			V
ILO 3 – Capable of mastering scientific paradigms in the fields of Development Economics, Financial Economics and Banking, Development Planning and Regional Finance, and Islamic Economics	V
ILO 4 – Capable of developing analytical methods and tools in quantitative and qualitative research in the field of Economics		V
ILO 5 – Capable of developing the theory of Economics and its application in the fields of Development Economics, Financial Economics and Banking, Development Planning and Regional Finance, and Islamic Economics	V
ILO 6 – Capable of evaluating economic policies and provide alternative solutions through inter and multidisciplinary approaches	V
ILO 7 – Capable of solving problems in the fields of Development Economics, Financial Economics and Banking, Development Planning and Regional Finance, and Islamic Economics through an inter and multidisciplinary approach	V
ILO 8 – Capable of managing research and development in the economic field at the regional, national and international levels		V
ILO 9 – Capable of developing logical, critical, systematic, creative thinking and develop scientific conceptions	V
ILO 10 – Capable of generating decisions in solving problems according to the development of science and technology through an inter and multidisciplinary approach		V
ILO 11 – Capable of communicating ideas, thoughts, and scientific arguments through a scientific approach and gain national and international recognition		V

PMIE map out the compulsory and elective courses based on its ILOs, and they are systematically organized while taking into account the student’s learning load and the complexity and depth of the study material. Learning activities during lectures are designed based on problem-solving related to current issues and developments in science and technology. In general, PMIE curriculum structures offer 120 credits. Students can take at least 42 credits and a maximum of 45 credits to graduate. Compulsory courses aim to develop graduates’ main competencies (approximately 85.72% of total credits) while elective courses aim to strengthen core competencies (approximately 14.28% of total credits).

Students are declared passed if they have taken a minimum of 42 credits with the following details:

Total Compulsory Course: 36 Credit Units
Total Elective Course available: 6 Credit Units

The complete PMIE curriculum structure is depicted in the roadmap below:

The type of credit system applied in PMIE is the Semester Credit Unit (SKS). If the SKS system is converted to the ECTS system, the credits that students of the PMIE Study Program must take are as follows:

Number of Credits for Compulsory courses (Study Program and Concentration) = 1.5 x 36 SKS = 54 ECTS
Number of credits for elective courses = 1.5 x 6 credits = 9 ECTS

Then the number of credits that PMIE students must take until graduation is 63 ECTS.

To see the curriculum structure in more detail, please access the following link:

Final – Curriculum Summary PMIE

1. Assessment of Learning Outcomes Based on Grading System

The assessment procedure for the Master’s Programme in Economics in all courses (except Thesis) is based on the assessment procedure contained in the FEB UB manual. The assessment procedure uses a grading system consisting of:

Components	Proportion
Participation	30%
Task	20%
Mid-Semester Exam (UTS)	25%
Final Semester Exam (UAS)	25%

Note: *) The weighting of the assessment components is adjusted to the learning outcomes and assessment methods in each study program. Based on the weighting of these value components, the absolute value calculation is as follows:

NA: 0.30 P + 0.20 T + 0.25 UTS + 0.25 UAS

Absolute Score	Grade Point	Grade Score
>80 – 100	A	4.0
>75 – 80	B+	3.5
>69 – 75	B	3.0
>60 – 69	C+	2.5
>55 – 60	C	2.0
>50 – 55	D+	1.5
>44 – 50	D	1.0
0 – 44	E	0.0

For post-graduate students, the minimum score needed to pass is B. For Thesis assessment, the final Thesis score is the weighted average of 4 activity stages, namely Proposal Exam, Field Research Activity, Research Result Seminar, and Thesis Exam with weights of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% respectively. The stages are shown in the table below:

No	Activity Stage	Proportion (%)	Absolute Proportion (Range)	Proportion x Absolute Value (Range)
1	Proposal Exam	10%	0 – 100	0 – 10
2	Field Research Activity	20%	0 – 100	0 – 20
3	Research Results Seminar	30%	0 – 100	0 – 30
4	Thesis Exam	40%	0 – 100	0 – 40
Total Proportion x Absolute Value				0 – 100

Proportion x Absolute Value	Grade Point	Grade Score
>80 – 100	A	4.0
>75 – 80	B+	3.5
>69 – 75	B	3.0
>60 – 69	C+	2.5
>55 – 60	C	2.0
>50 – 55	D+	1.5
>44 – 50	D	1.0
0 – 44	E	0.0

The absolute value of each activity stage is the arithmetic average of the values given by the supervisor and or examiner lecturer. The following is an assessment for each stage of the activity.

a) Proposal Exam

The Proposal Exam was attended by 4 lecturers with details of 2 supervisors and 2 examiners. Thus, the value of the proposal exam is the arithmetic average of the scores given by the four lecturers.

No	Rating By	Score (Range)
1	Supervisor 1	0 – 100
2	Supervisor 2	0 – 100
3	Examiner 1	0 – 100
4	Examiner 2	0 – 100
Average of Advisory Lecturer and Examiner		0 – 100

No	Assessment Components	Score (Range)
1	Thesis Proposal Draft	0 – 100
2	Presentation of Thesis Proposal	0 – 100
3	Ability to Defend Thesis Proposal	0 – 100
Rating Component Average		0 – 100

b) Field Research Activity

The Field Research Activity was attended by supervisors. Thus, the value of the Field Research Activity is the arithmetic average of the scores given by the two lecturers.

No	Rating by	Score (Range)
1	Supervisor 1	0 – 100
2	Supervisor 2	0 – 100
Average of Advisory Lecturer		0 – 100

No	Assessment Components	Score (Range)
1	Data Collection Process	0 – 100
2	Preliminary Findings	0 – 100
Rating Component Average		0 – 100

c) Research Results Seminar

The Research Results Seminar was attended by supervisors. Thus, the value of the research seminar is the arithmetic average of the scores given by the two lecturers.

No	Rating by	Score (Range)
1	Supervisor 1	0 – 100
2	Supervisor 2	0 – 100
Average of Advisory Lecturer		0 – 100

No	Assessment Components	Score (Range)
1	Seminar on Thesis Research Results	0 – 100
2	Manuscript Presentation / Presentation	0 – 100
3	Discussion / Question – Answer / Dialogue	0 – 100
Rating Component Average		0 – 100

d) Thesis Exam

The Thesis Exam was attended by 4 lecturers with details of 2 supervisors and 2 examiners. Thus, the thesis test scores are the arithmetic mean of the scores given by the four lecturers.

No	Rating by	Score (Range)
1	Supervisor 1	0 – 100
2	Supervisor 2	0 – 100
3	Examiner 1	0 – 100
4	Examiner 2	0 – 100
Average of Advisory Lecturer and Examiner		0 – 100

No	Assessment Components	Score (Range)
1	Thesis Draft	0 – 100
2	Thesis Presentation	0 – 100
3	Ability to Defend Thesis	0 – 100
Rating Component Average		0 – 100

2. Assessment of ILO Achievements

The following is the method of measuring or achieving the ILO’s Master of Economics Study Program:

a) Develop linkages between CLO and ILO Master of Economics Study Program

b) Develop CLO weighting based on assessment components (Participation, Assignments, UTS, UAS). The CLO weighting for each component of the course is arranged based on the relevance between the ILO/CLO and the assessment method

c) ILO and CLO achievement standards

Score Range	Achievements
80 <= Score	Excellent
65 <= Score < 80	Good
50 <= Score < 65	Fair
0 < Score < 50	Poor

No	Position	Name
1	Professor	Prof. Dr. AGUS SUMAN, SE., DEA.
2	Professor	Prof. Dr. CANDRA FAJRI ANANDA, S.E., M.Sc.
3	Professor	Prof. DEVANTO SHASTA PRATOMO, S.E., M.Si., Ph.D.
4	Professor	Prof. Dr. GHOZALI MASKI, SE., MS.
5	Professor	Prof. Dr. KHUSNUL ASHAR, SE., M.A.
6	Professor	Prof. Dr. M. PUDJIHARDJO, S.E., M.S.
7	Professor	Prof. Dr. MARYUNANI, SE., MS.
8	Professor	Prof. Dr. MOH. KHUSAINI, S.E., M.Si., M.A.
9	Professor	Prof. Dr. M. UMAR BURHAN
10	Professor	Prof. Dr. MUNAWAR, SE., DEA.
11	Associate Professor	Dr. Dra. ASFI MANZILATI, ME.
12	Associate Professor	DAVID KALUGE, SE., MS., M.Ec.Dev., Ph.D.
13	Associate Professor	DWI BUDI SANTOSO, SE., MS., Ph.D.
14	Associate Professor	Dr. Drs. ISWAN NOOR, ME.
15	Associate Professor	Dr. Dra. MULTIFIAH, MS.
16	Associate Professor	PUTU MAHARDIKA ADI SAPUTRA, SE., M.Si., MA., Ph.D.
17	Associate Professor	Dr. Drs. SASONGKO, MS.
18	Associate Professor	SETYO TRI WAHYUDI, SE., M.Ec., Ph.D.
19	Associate Professor	Dr. SRI MULJANINGSIH, SE., MSP.
20	Associate Professor	Dr. SUSILO, SE., MS.
21	Assistant Professor	DIAS SATRIA, SE., M.App.Ec., Ph.D.
22	Assistant Professor	Dr.rer.pol. FERRY PRASETYIA, SE., M.App.Ec.
23	Assistant Professor	Dra. MARLINA EKAWATY, M.Si., Ph.D.
24	Assistant Professor	Dr. NURUL BADRIYAH, S.E., M.E.
25	Assistant Professor	Dr. RACHMAD KRESNA SAKTI, SE., M.Si.
26	Assistant Professor	Dr.rer.pol. WILDAN SYAFITRI, SE., ME.
27	Lecturer	FAISHAL FADLI, S.E., M.E., Ph.D.
28	Lecturer	FARAH WULANDARI PANGESTUTY, S.E., M.E., Ph.D.
29	Lecturer	NUGROHO SURYO BINTORO, S.E., M.Ec.Dev., Ph.D.
30	Lecturer	VIETHA DEVIA SS, S.E., M.E., Ph.D.