Ekonomi Islam

The following is the profile of graduates of the Islamic Economics Study Programme

Graduate Profile	Profile Description
Research assistant	Assigned in terms of assisting researchers in conducting research, development, and assessment of science and technology in research organizations, development and assessment of government/private institutions.
Staff in Islamic Finance and ZISWAF	Served as staff in the field of Islamic finance, both banks and non-banks as well as ZISWAF institutions that play a role in supporting economic activities
Assistant Analyst in Islamic Economics	Serves as an assistant analyst and consultant in the field of Islamic Economics who is able to plan, analyse, and compile reports on business planning and/or research in the field of Islamic Economics
Young entrepreneurs	Tasked with creating business opportunities in the field of Islamic Economics in supporting economic acceleration

The learning outcomes of graduates (ILO) of the Undergraduate Programme in Islamic Economics include 4 competencies, namely attitudes, general skills, special skills, Mastery of Knowledge as follows:

ILO	PEO 1	PEO 2	PEO 3
ILO-1: Capable of internalizing professional academic values, norms, and ethics (S8)			v
ILO 2: Capable of demonstrating a responsible attitude towards work in the field of expertise independently (S9)			v
ILO 3: Capable of applying logical, critical, systematic, and innovative thinking in the context of developing or implementing science and technology that pays attention to and applies humanities values ​​(KU1)		v
ILO 4 : Capable of compiling a scientific description of the results of studies on the implications of the development or implementation of science and technology that pays attention to and applies the values ​​of the humanities in accordance with their field of expertise based on scientific principles, procedures and ethics in order to produce solutions, ideas, designs or art criticisms, compiling a scientific description of the results the study in the form of a thesis or final project report (KU3, KU 4)		v
ILO 5: Capable of generating appropriate decisions in the context of problem solving based on the results of information and data analysis (KU5)		v
ILO 6: Capable of demonstrating critical thinking in the fields of economics, finance and business that are in accordance with Islamic principles (KK1)	v
ILO 7: Capable of applying economic, financial, and business theory to analyse economic development issues and policies in order to solve economic problems at the regional, national, and global levels of Islamic Economics principles (KK6)	v
ILO 8: Capable of publishing and conducting research, analyse and interpret data with quantitative and qualitative approaches in the field of Islamic economics (KK3, KK7)		v
ILO 9: Capable of mastering the concepts and theories of Islamic economics (P1, P2, P3, P4)	v
ILO 10: Capable of mastering the theoretical concepts of muamalah law (P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10)	v

PS EKIS map out the compulsory and elective courses based on its ILOs, and they are systematically organized while taking into account the student’s learning load and the complexity and depth of the study material. In general, PS EKIS curriculum structures offer 168 credits, but the student can take at least 148 credits and a maximum of 160 credits to graduate. These credits are divided into seven subject groups: General/National Compulsory Courses (8 credits), University Compulsory Courses (14 credits), Faculty Compulsory Courses (18 credits), Department Compulsory Courses (36 credits), Compulsory Courses for Study Programs (36 credits), Compulsory Interest Courses (21 credits), and Elective Courses (15 credits). PS EKIS has accomodated MBKM curriculum by providing convertible course into MBKM activities approximately 20 credits. In any case, student participate in MBKM activities, the total credits students take until graduation is 149. Compulsory courses aim to develop graduates’ main competencies (approximately 88% of total credits) while elective courses aim to strengthen core competencies (approximately 12% of total credits).

Students are declared passed if they have taken a minimum of 149 credits with the following details:

1. The number of credits for compulsory courses is 144 credits and a maximum of 160 credits
2. The number of credits of elective courses available is 18 credits

The complete PS EKIS curriculum structure is depicted in the roadmap below:

The type of credit system applied in PS EKIS is the Semester Credit Unit (SKS). If the SKS system is converted to the ECTS system, the credits that must be taken by students of the PS EKIS without participate in MBKM activities are as follows:

• Number of Credits for General/National Compulsory Courses (8 SKS) = 1.5x8SKS = 12 ECTS
• Number of Credits for University Compulsory Courses (14 credits) = 1.5x14SKS = 21 ECTS
• Number of Credits for Compulsory Faculty Courses (18 credits = 1.5×18 credits = 27 ECTS
• Number of credits for Major Compulsory Courses (36 credits) = 1.5×36 credits = 54 ECTS
• Number of SKS for Study Programme Compulsory Courses (57 SKS) = 1.5×57 SKS = 85,5 ECTS
• Number of Credits for Elective Courses (15 SKS) = 1.5×15 SKS = 22.5 ECTS

Then the number of credits PS EKIS students must take until graduation is 222 ECTS. Meanwhile,  in case student takes MBKM for two semesters, the number of credit that PS EKIS students must take for graduation is 149 sks or equal to 223.5 ECTS

To see the curriculum structure in more detail, please access the following link:

Final – Curriculum Summary PS EKIS

1.Assessment of learning outcomes based on the grading system

The assessment procedure for PS EKIS in all courses (except KKN-P and Thesis) is based on the assessment procedure contained in the FEB UB manual. The assessment procedure uses a grading system based on an OBE-based curriculum which consists of two methods, namely the case method and team-based project. The following are the assessment components for the case method:

Components	Proportion
Participation	55%
Quiz	5%
Task	10%
Mid-Semester Exam (UTS)	15%
Final Semester Exam (UAS)	15%

Note: *) the proportion of the assessment components is adjusted to the learning outcomes and assessment methods in each study programme

Meanwhile, the assessment components for the team-based project can be seen in the following table.

Components	Proportion
Participation	25%
Quiz	10%
Project	35%
Mid-Semester Exam (UTS)	15%
Final Semester Exam (UAS)	15%

Based on the proportion of these value components, the absolute value calculation is as follows:

NA Case Method: 0,55 P + 0,5Q + 0,1 TS + 0,15 UTS + 0,15 UAS

NA Team Based Project: 0,25 P + 0,1Q + 0,35 HP + 0,15 UTS + 0,15 UAS

Absolute Score	Letter Score	Letter Grade Proportion
>80 – 100	A	4.0
>75 – 80	B+	3.5
>69 – 75	B	3.0
>60 – 69	C+	2.5
>55 – 60	C	2.0
>50 – 55	D+	1.5
>44 – 50	D	1.0
0 – 44	E	0.0

For KKN-P has its own assessment method. The final KKN-P score is a combination of the scores given by the KKN-P partners and also the KKN-P supervisor lecturers. The following are the assessment components for KKN-P partners and supervisors as follows:

KKN-P Partner Assessment			KKN-P Advisor
Assessment Component	Score Range	Assessment Component		Score Range
1.    Technical ability/assignment of KKN-P material	0-100	1.    Relevance area of ​​expertise		0-100
2.    Creativity	0-100	2.    Ability to explain (maintain)		0-100
3.    Leadership	0-100	3.    Level of difficulty		0-100
4.    Communication skills	0-100	4.    Report presentation		0-100
5.    Discipline	0-100
6.    Politeness	0-100
7.    Appearance	0-100
Average score of KKN-P partners	0-100	average score of the supervising lecturer		0-100

The seven aspects assessed by the KKN-P Partners were averaged, as were the four aspects assessed by the KKN-P supervisors. The average results of the KKN-P Partner scores and supervisors are added up and then averaged again to obtain the absolute final score. The provisions for the final grade of KKN-P in letters follow the same provisions as other courses

As for the thesis using a different assessment method. The thesis examination stages are divided into 2, namely the Proposal Seminar Examination and the Comprehensive Examination. The Proposal Seminar Exam has a weight of 33% and the Comprehensive Exam has a weight of 67% towards the final score of the Student Thesis. The provisions for the final value of the Thesis in letters follow the same provisions as other courses. For each exam has the same assessment components, namely:

Assessment Component	Proportion
Thesis Quality	50%
Mastery of Thesis & Theory Materials	30%
Presentation Quality	20%
Total score	100%

2.Assessment of ILO AchievementsThe following is the method of measuring or achieving ILO PS EKIS:

a)Develop linkages between CLO and ILO PS EKIS

b)Develop CLO weighting based on assessment components (participation, quizzes, assignments, UTS, UAS). The CLO weighting for each component of the course is arranged based on the relevance between the ILO/CLO and the assessment method which is distinguished based on the CLO aspect and the type of courses offered, as shown in the following table:

ILO/CLO Group	Nature of Courses	Assessment Method
Attitude	Theory & Applied Economics Course	Participation & Assignments
Knowledge	Theory & Applied Economics Course	Assignments, Quiz, UTS and UAS
Applied Skills/Analysis	Applied economics & analytical methods course	Participation and Assignments

c)ILO and CLO achievement standards

Score Range	Achievements
80	Excellent
65 score < 80	Good
50 score < 65	Fair
0 score < 50	Poor

No	Position	Name
1	Professor	Prof.Dr. AGUS SUMAN, SE., DEA.
2	Professor	Prof.Dr. Dra. ASFI MANZILATI, ME.
3	Professor	Prof.DEVANTO SHASTA PRATOMO, S.E., M.Si., Ph.D.
4	Professor	Prof.Dr. M. PUDJIHARDJO, S.E., M.S.
5	Professor	Prof.Dr. MARYUNANI, SE., MS.
6	Professor	Prof.Dr. Drs. M. UMAR BURHAN, MS.
7	Professor	Prof.Dr. MUNAWAR, SE., DEA.
8	Professor	Prof.SETYO TRI WAHYUDI, SE., M.Ec., Ph.D.
9	Associate Professor	Dr. Drs. ISWAN NOOR, ME.
10	Associate Professor	Dr. SRI MULJANINGSIH, SE., MSP.
11	Associate Professor	DWI BUDI SANTOSO, SE., MS., Ph.D.
12	Assistant Professor	AMINNULLAH ACHMAD MUTTAQIN, M.Sc., Fin.
13	Assistant Professor	FAISHAL FADLI, S.E., M.E., Ph.D.
14	Assistant Professor	Dra. MARLINA EKAWATY, M.Si., Ph. D.
15	Assistant Professor	Dr. NURUL BADRIYAH, S.E., M.E.
16	Assistant Professor	Dr.rer.pol. WILDAN SYAFITRI, SE., ME.
17	Assistant Professor	Dr.rer.pol. FERRY PRASETYIA, SE., M.App.Ec.
18	Assistant Professor	FARAH WULANDARI PANGESTUTY, S.E., M.E., Ph.D.
19	Lecturer	AJENG KARTIKA GALUH, S.E., M.E.
20	Lecturer	DWI RETNO WIDIYANTI, SE.I., M.Sc.
21	Lecturer	GIRINDRA MEGA PAKSI, S.E., M.E.
22	Lecturer	IKA KHUSNIA ANGGRAINI, S.HI., M.H.I.
23	Lecturer	LAILA MASRURO PIMADA, S.E., M.S.E.I.
24	Lecturer	MOH. ATHOILLAH, S.E., M.E.
25	Lecturer	NUGROHO SURYO BINTORO, S.E., M.Ec.Dev., Ph.D.
26	Lecturer	YENNY KORNITASARI, S.E., M.E.
27	Lecturer	INDRI SUPRIANI, S.E., M.SEI.
28	Lecturer	MUHAMMAD DANDY ALIF WILDANA, S.E., M.Sc.IBF.
29	Lecturer	CITRA RAHAYU INDRASWARI, S.EI., M.SEI.